Listening to free improvisation -- and that's "free" as in "without  constraints" rather than "less-than-cheap" -- is a difficult proposition  for many. Daunting. Impenetrable. Off-putting. Icky. Well it doesn't  have to be. I mean, I won't twist your arm: dislike it if you must. But  some free improv can be quite beautiful, and even when not beautiful, it  can be thought-provoking and otherwise stimulating.
Free improvisation is both the most natural and primal form of  musical expression and also a music of high discipline and  concentration, depending, for the ratio, on the player. It is a practice  of improvising music without recourse to pre-written melody, harmony or  rhythm. In the most extreme examples, it's a music purposefully outside  all musical tradition, often called "non-idiomatic" improvisation. My  own improvisation practice -- and I believe Ryan's too -- is more  pan-idiomatic (a term coined by guitarist Jim McAuley.)
For most folks it is an "extreme" listening experience. I suspect  that improv is most enjoyed by those who have listened to a lot of  music, and are looking for something very different; something that  doesn't play by the usual rules. That was how I got into it -- I set out  to find the most out-there, unconventional guitar music there was. I  wanted to know what creativity sounded like outside the firelight circle  of tradition. I found Derek Bailey, Roger Smith, Joe Morris and Jim  McAuley, among others, and I got what I needed.
The special thing about free improvisation is that you can hear the  player navigate the split-second bends of thinking, feeling and acting.  You can hear ideas pursued, weighed, and abandoned. How does she handle  the inevitable dead-ends? Does she repeat material? From how far back?  How does her memory work? You never know what might happen. Sometimes  the music is peaceful and meditative, sometimes quite agitated. And  sometimes it's crap and sometimes it's brilliant.
You might have guessed by now that this week's track, E. Ryan  Goodman's "Sun City Flats", is a free improvisation. There are other  examples on the site, such as "Blimp", "Goodmorning Junction" and  "Quiver", but there hasn't been anything written about the practice so  far. So I asked Ryan if he'd be kind enough to answer some questions  about "Sun City Flats", hoping we could provide a modest entree into  free improvisation for the uninitiated.
WBR: Ryan, you've played different kinds of  music, like rock and fingerstyle guitar -- what do you get out of the  experience of free improvisation that you don't get otherwise?
ERG: I enjoy its honesty. Its immediacy and  directness is also special to me. Without the slightest thought of  melody I pick up my guitar, play, and there it is.  The material is not  preconceived; it's what my ears like to hear and how I make that sound  on the guitar. To some extent it is technique, but I also like to think  of it as happenstance within the stream-of-consciousness.
WBR: You also listen to many different kinds of  music. What do you get from listening to a free improvisation recording  or concert?
ERG: I get affected on many levels. I find that  solo improvised guitar, or any instrument, is an intimate insight into  the player and their life experience. In that musical communication  between player and listener we get to know something about the artist.  It's a thing that words cannot define; it's otherworldly.
WBR: In your opinion, what makes a free  improvisation good or bad?
ERG: For me there always has to be that aesthetic  beauty in any music. Players that give notes and chords room to breathe  and compliment one another are the players I want to hear. I don't think  there is a "bad" improvised piece, only maybe poor choices and ugly  notes.
WBR: Can you tell me a little about what your  intentions were when you went into this recording session, what the  sessions were like, and how you feel about the results?
ERG: The funny thing with this session is that I  didn't think a lot about it before we started recording, which is out of  character for me.  I had a few compositions down and I knew I was going  to play some improvisations, but that was it.  I wish I had thought  more about the session in advance, but I was very pleased with the  tracks we ended up with in a short time, some of which will be on my  upcoming album (probably early 2010). This was the first time I recorded  in a proper studio and it was a nice experience. Josh is an old friend  and a great engineer to work with. He was very thoughtful and patient  the entire day we recorded.
WBR: Let's say you're introducing this track to a  website visitor who generally doesn't listen to improv. Is there  anything you could say to help him get the most out of the listening  experience? Could you provide some insight into what you listen for in  improv? Do you think that context can increase someone's enjoyment of a  style of music they're not used to? Or is it best to just "let the music  speak for itself"?
ERG: I'd say, be open. What is the artist saying?  I'd add that this is another artistic way to communicate, just like  writing or visual art. I wouldn't disclose anything else though; the  music should always speak for itself. You either get what the artist is  saying or you don't. Every person has an artistic voice. If you wish to  share that voice, then you can do it in any medium you like. I feel that  every listener is going to come away with their own experience when  they listen to an improvised track from any given artist. Just try to be  open to it cause you never know what you're going to get.